Featured Post

Me and My Mission

Showing posts with label Democratic Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democratic Government. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

The Global Civil War: The Enlightenment, Nationalism, Anger, Inequality, IS, and Trump


 Age of Anger by Pankaj Mishra
Age of Anger: A History of the Prestent by by Pankaj Mishra, published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017.

Why is the world so angry?

These three programs from CBC Ideas help weave together the threads that reveal the answer.

Tuesday April 18, 2017

Globalized Anger: The Enlightenment's Unwanted Child

Trumpism. Hindu nationalism. ISIS. Chinese expansionism. People everywhere seem fed up with the status quo, and their anger and intolerance are finding political expression. But why? Pankaj Mishra believes that the current unrest isn't about any so-called "clash of civilizations" between the enlightened and unenlightened. He thinks the globalized anger is the legitimate offspring of the Enlightenment itself. He speaks with Paul Kennedy about his provocative book, The Age of Anger: A History of the Present.
"We should really look at the modern world as constituted by sameness and similarity rather than religious, cultural, theological difference. Obviously, people make all kinds of claims for their cultural and theological differences, whether it's members of Islamic State, or whether it's Christian fundamentalists or white nationalists, who are very insistent that their, race their religion, their nation, is unique and they are speaking on behalf of that -- on behalf of a particular tradition.

But I think the task of the interpreter is to go beyond these statements, not take them at face value. And to see what are the ways in which these supposedly disparate and diverse peoples are connected. What is the experience they are responding to, and what is their worldview, their particular makeup? And this is where I think terrorism, for instance, has always been a universal phenomenon. And behind that lies the temptation of violence as a kind of aesthetic, as a kind of existential experience -- and you see that right from the 19th century onwards, as a way of asserting your individual self, as a way of empowering yourself. And we see that again and again in modern terrorism, whether it is the man, Omar Mateen, who in Florida was constantly Googling himself, even while he was killing people: he was trying to see what people were saying about him. This kind of exhibitionism -- this is an attempt to find yourself, and to become famous, and to be celebrated by other people.

Terrorism, in almost all cases, is not separate from the way we live our lives today, in the ways in which we think of ourselves and the wider world. And I try to make this clear in a variety of ways, including describing this friendship that sprung up between Timothy McVeigh and Ramzi Yousef, the first man to try to blow up the World Trade Center. They found themselves in adjacent cells in a supermax prison in Colorado, and discovered that they had far more in common with each other than with anyone else around them. In fact, Yousef is on record as saying that: 'I've never met anyone who was more like me.' And this is a man who had spent most of his life moving through networks of various fanatics and radical Islamists. So it's really important to see how there are all these psychological affinities, emotional makeup, that connect these diverse figures --  and how this experience of powerlessness, experience of humiliation, the desire for vengeance connect all these different sorts of figures.

We have to move away from thinking of terror or violence as being specific to a particular religious community, or a particular part of the world. We have seen this over and over again erupt in all parts of the world. And we have to locate the sources of this violence in specific social, economic factors: we cannot really bring in religious scriptures, or indeed stereotypes about religious communities into our frameworks of analysis. If we do that, we are making a huge mistake."


​Pankaj Mishra is a London-based Indian writer and thinker who has written widely on history, politics, and literature. Age of Anger: A History of the Present is his ninth book. It's published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017.

Further reading:
  • America At War With Itself by Henry Giroux, published by City Lights Books, 2017.
  • The View From Flyover Country by Sarah Kendzior published by Amazon Digital Services LLC, 2015.
  • How Will Capitalism End?: Essays on a Failing System by Wolfgang Streeck published by Verso, 2016.

**This episode was produced by Naheed Mustafa.

Wednesday April 19, 2017

Drone Warfare: Is Killing Terrorists Legal?


An MQ-9 Reaper remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) flies by during a training mission at Creech Air Force Base on November 17, 2015 in Indian Springs, Nevada. The Pentagon has plans to expand combat air patrols flights by remotely piloted aircraft by as much as 50 percent over the next few years to meet an increased need for surveillance, reconnaissance and lethal airstrikes in more areas around the world.

An MQ-9 Reaper remotely piloted aircraft (RPWolfgang Streeck on the various ways citizens living in the post-capitalist interregnum will behaveA) flies by during a training mission at Creech Air Force Base on November 17, 2015 in Indian Springs, Nevada. The Pentagon has plans to expand combat air patrols flights by remotely piloted aircraft by as much as 50 percent over the next few years to meet an increased need for surveillance, reconnaissance and lethal airstrikes in more areas around the world. (Photo by Isaac Brekken/Getty Images)
Listen to Full Episode 53:57
On 30 September 2011, American military drone operators at an Air Force base in Nevada spotted Anwar al-Awlaki in northern Yemen. The radical Muslim cleric -- and American citizen -- was in a desert more than 13,000 kilometres away, sitting near an SUV. Awlaki spotted the drones and ran to the vehicle. Back in Nevada, an operator clicked a button. And within seconds, two Hellfire missiles blew the SUV to smithereens. In Objective Troy, Scott Shane examines the rise of an American radical cleric and President Obama's decision to have him killed.  **This episode originally aired May 11, 2016.


  "This is part of a generational conflict between the US and the West - and Canada - and a certain strain of Islam. And I think it is going to play out for many years to come. I wouldn't have said this a few years ago, but I think with the rise of ISIS and the tentacles of ISIS turning up in Western Europe, and indeed in Canada and the US, that we are in for a long drawn out conflict. And I think that Anwar al-Awlaki will remain a central figure, a central propagandiste all over the English-speaking West, and indeed since many of these videos are now put up in translation in many other languages as well." -- Scott Shane

Objective Troy: A Terrorist, A President, and the Rise of the Drone is published by Tim Duggan Books.


Scott Shane - 2016 Gelber Prize Winner
Scott Shane is awarded the 2016 Lionel Gelber Prize for his book "Objective Troy: A Terrorist, a President, and the Rise of the Drone"

Scott Shane covers national security issues for the New York Times and is this year's winner of the prestigious Lionel Gelber Prize. The award is given to the world's best non-fiction book in English on foreign affairs.
The Lionel Gelber Foundation awards the prize in partnership with Foreign Policy magazine and the Munk School of Global Affairs, at the University of Toronto.

** This episode was produced by David Gutnick.

Thursday February 09, 2017

Surviving Post-Capitalism: Coping, hoping, doping & shopping

Poster of video clip
Listen to Full Episode 53:59
The signs are troubling: the ever-widening chasm between the ultra-rich and everyone else. Mass protests. Political upheaval and social division. It looks as though the rocky marriage between capitalism and democracy is doomed, at least according to Wolfgang Streeck, who directs the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne, Germany, where he is also a professor of sociology. In conversation with Paul Kennedy about his book How Will Capitalism End?, he makes the unnerving case that capitalism is now at a point where it cannot survive itself.


How Will Capitalism End? by Wolfgang Streeck
(Verso Books, 2016.)
According to Streeck, capitalist societies are entering an interregnum -- a pause or suspension of normal governance -- as the system of capitalism collapses in on itself. In the absence of countervailing forces to keep it afloat, capitalism has essentially devoured itself. One consequence is a loss of state solidarity citizens in western countries have become used to. Streeck points to Italy, Greece and Spain, countries where young people can't get find jobs; where fewer people can live on their own; and where marriage and birth rates are declining. People everywhere are now trying to protect what little they have left.

Wolfgang Streeck sees day-to-day life in the interregnum in stark terms: coping, hoping, doping, and shopping. He says that when it comes to the harsh realities of the interregnum, those who cope well will wear their stress as a kind of badge of honour. Those who cope poorly will mask their inability with drugs and mindless consumerism.

Democracy vs. Capitalism

"Democracy was always a problem in a capitalist society. There's an enormous inherent tension between the two. Democracy is inherently egalitarian because every citizen has one vote. And the rich also have one vote but the rich are only five percent. Whereas in the market, every dollar has a vote. And the capitalist economy in particular functions according to -- I think it's [the Gospel of] Matthew -- where it says he who has will be given [more]. And he who has [little] will have even what he has taken away...

And where you have capitalism and democracy at the same time, you have a contest between these two principles of distribution: egalitarian versus inegalitarian. This is why democratic politics have always tried to intervene in the markets and tried to contain the "Matthew effect". You can also call it cumulative advantage if you want a more elevated term. So, where you have democracy in the form of trade unions, centre left political parties, sometimes centre right political parties, Catholic parties, and so on -- they look at the market and what comes out of the market and then they become concerned both about their capacity to get re-elected and about principles of justice which, in a democracy, are principles of social justice, not market justice."

Coping to Death

"Coping is an attitude or an activity whereby people who lack traditional support -- either from families or from social services -- work very hard to cope with increasing pressures on their everyday life.

And you can observe this in lots of studies on family life in the United States and Europe, where two people work full-time, they try to raise two children, they live a very sort of regulated, exhausting life in order to meet all the contingencies that hang together with competing in the labour market -- caring for others, caring maybe also for their parents, in a world in which external help is increasingly less available.

Now what I observe in ethnographic studies is that people actually can become proud of their ability to exhaust themselves in this struggle. So that they say we are coping, we're good, and others are less good or bad at coping. So it becomes a matter of pride to subject yourself to this rigid discipline imposed on you by the market."

Nuclear-Proof Apartments

"[In] The New Yorker, there was an article on survivalism among the American very, very rich. In my book, I envisage a situation in which inequality becomes so big that something happens that has never happened in society before in the history of human societies. That is, that the elites of society lose interest in the society as a whole because they can survive on their own.

Someone, for example, buys the silo of an intercontinental missile which is hardened against nuclear attack, and deep in the ground builds apartments that he sells within a matter of a few weeks to New York financial billionaires, tech billionaires from California, who all buy one of these apartments because they are afraid of the breakdown of social order, and of people taking guns and trying to go after them.

I think these people are not so unrealistic. I don't think they are obsessed. They see better than most others the decaying body of a system that can no longer keep itself together. I take this as a very interesting example of what I thought when I looked at the increase in inequality in our societies that we could be facing the moment when those who absorb and extract all the resources from these societies begin to think that they can dissociate themselves from it and live their own lives."

**The New Yorker article: "Doomsday Prep for the Super-Rich"

The Coming Age of Uncertainty

"As a sociologist, I think we have to think very seriously about transitions in the structure of our societies. I happen to have come to the conclusion that we are facing a fundamental transition in modern societies, modern capitalist societies. And I feel that these societies have exhausted the capacity to build a framework, a social framework, around the hot core of capitalist profit-making -- so that we will see signs of social disintegration all over the place in unexpected, surprising ways, in a period in which we lose control and governance and orientation, and we'll live in an era of great uncertainty."

Further reading:
  • How Will Capitalism End? by Wolfgang Streeck, published by Verso Books, 2016.
     
  • PostCapitalism: A Guide to our Future by Paul Mason, published by Allen Lane, 2015.
     
  • The End of Alchemy: Banking, the Global Economy and the Future of Money by Mervyn King, published by W.W. Norton, 2016.
Related websites:
**This episode was produced by Naheed Mustafa.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

#TNC: The #Treaty #Nations of #Canada

Depending on how you look at it (see below), Canada was conceived in 1840, born in 1867, grew and developed into adolescence in 1982, and may have graduated high-school in 1999. Now, having formed a the first ideas of who we may be and might wish to become, we've entered Truth and Reconciliation University as our higher brains and decision making abilities mature and expand to the realities of adulthood. We take on responsibility. British North America has developed into colonial province, into a dominion of an empire, then an immature country, and now it needs to mature into a true federation of the Treaty Nations of Canada (T N.C, which could also generally refer to the foundational Three  Nations of Canada).

Canada started as a colony and remained one in exploitative spirit, practice, and reality, until 1982. However it still retains the spirit and far too many of the practice. We remain exploiters of people, places, and resources, dependent of exports that are developed then sold back to us for the benefit of the colonizers. We were a British colony, then an American one, and we're now aiming to serve China, multinational corporate shareholders, or our own pension fund investments. We actually colonize ourselves now, mercenary self-exploiters too dependent to break free and develop our labour labour, land, and resources for our own good.

We were never a confederation. Our present federation recognizes only two participants and founders. However there was a third "nation', actually many independent nations, who made legally binding treaties with the anglophone and francophone "nations" that enabled Canada to develop and grow past infancy. Treaties without which there could have been no Canada in its current form. Treaties immediately ignored as the government pushed the majority of the nations out of the way and waited for their inevitable doom to take away the Indian Problem. When it didn't they tried to kill the inner Indian.The walking wounded of the Betrayed Nations of America are everywhere among us. We continue to blame the victims of the crimes of colony and glorify the criminals.

Maturity as a modern diverse democratic state requires not only reconciliation, but the reformation of our federation and the renewal and return to the founding treaties.

The Confederation of Canada needs to grow-up and realize who it really is and always should have been, a peaceful federation of the Treaty Nations of Canada. We need to fully abandon the dependent mentality of dominion in service to foreign empire and end the exploitation of our colonial culture. Ditching the symbolic monarchy and its patriarchal governors for a Canadian head of state perhaps elected from a senate turned into an Assembly of Founding Nations, representing all provinces, territories, and First Nations.



We could change the Parliament of Canada to the Parliamentary Treaty Assembly of Canada without changing the House of Commons or renaming Parliament Hill and such.  The House would still be governed by the majority party and led by the Prime Minister. The Senate could be changed to the Council of Elders with the recent changes continued and expanded toward complete Red Chamber independence, demographic representation, and merit.  The present number of Elders could be divided or increased to include each of the First Nations.  

Getting rid of the colonial governors, we could fill the role of head of state with an individual elected from the senate or a similar pool of qualified prospects, perhaps with emphasis on constitutional knowledge, federal court experience, and/or a background in education or diplomacy. Once nominated by a variety of possible methods, the head of state would be elected or confirmed by a free vote of both chambers of the Assembly and officially appointed by the PM as usual. They would function in the capacity and roles but would have actual legitimacy and independence in their duties regarding enacting laws, parliament creation and dissolution, loss of confidence, coalition creation in lieu of majority, and constitutional crisis.

I’m not sure what to call our replacements for a hereditary monarch and privileged appointees, but here are some thoughts in no particular order:
  • National Elder and  Regional Elders
  • National Chief and Regional Chiefs
  • Treaty Grand Chief and Treaty Chiefs
  • Treaty Chief and Treaty Elders
  • Assembly Grand Chief and Assembly Chiefs
  • Treaty Speaker and Regional Speakers
  • Grand Elder and Regional Elders
  • Treaty Guide and Regional Guides
  • Assembly Guide and Regional Elders
Let's make Canada Day our independence day from colonialism, betrayal, and attempted genocide. Let it be our day of celebration for all the milestones and treaties and immigrant "nations" that have woven the present Canadian federation in hopes of creating one that we can all love without the conflicted pain of an abused child.


I am a child of colonization benefiting from a treaty inheritance, stolen from the siblings who shared it freely.

I am a citizen of Treaty Nations of Canada, bound by agreements and respect for fellow citizens.


I am Canadian.

#TNC


Canada is celebrating 150 years of… what, exactly?

How to count the country’s age may depend on how you look at things.

You don't look a day past 149

The year 2017 marks 150 years since Confederation. Or rather, what we've come to call Confederation.
Canada is actually a federation, but the term Confederation caught on in the in the 19th century and it stuck — we've named squares and bridges after it, we refer to the "Fathers of Confederation" (and the Mothers too!), and the word has come to represent the country and the events that created it.
"It" being "one Dominion under the crown," a.k.a. the Dominion of Canada, as per the British North America Act of 1867 that unified the colonies (Province of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick).
 BNA Act
 Leaders gathered in Quebec City 150 years ago to create the British North America Act. ( Library and Archives Canada)

Union wasn't a new concept — the idea was first presented in early 1800s, and the Act of Union in 1840 saw Upper and Lower Canada (English- and French-speaking Canada respectively, more or less) tie the knot to form the Province of Canada.
On July 1, 1867, it was just four provinces (Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick) that composed the new Dominion of Canada. The rest of the provinces and territories joined and were formed over time, Nunavut being the most recent, which officially separated from Northwest Territories in 1999. So you could say that Canada as we know it — ten provinces and three territories — is turning 18.

Your ID says 35


In 1982, Canada "patriated" the constitution, a political process that led to Canadian sovereignty, allowing Canadians to amend our Constitution without requiring Britain's approval. This, the Constitution Act of 1982, was a landmark event and enacted our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Yes, this declaration of independence took place in the '80s, and it was in 1982 that "Dominion Day," aka July 1, was renamed in Parliament to "Canada Day."

Oh Canada, you millennial, you.

TRUDEAU CONSTITUTIONAL PROCLAMATION

Queen Elizabeth signed the proclamation of the patriation of the Canadian Constitution on April 17, 1982, followed by then prime minister Pierre Trudeau. (Canadian Press)

(And if we're being technical, the Constitution Act itself cleaned up a bit of unfinished business from the Statute of Westminster in 1931, in which Britain granted each of the Dominions full legal autonomy if they chose to accept it. All but one Dominion — that would be us, Canada — chose to accept every resolution. Our leaders couldn't decide on how to amend the Constitution, so that power stayed with Britain until 1982.)

Our home on Native land?

For many Indigenous people (and non-Indig people, too), Canada exists on stolen land. While multiple First Nations have treaty agreements with Canada, others do not; there are unceded territories, and broken treaties too.
The Royal Proclamation of 1763, enshrined in our current Constitution Act, says that any land not given up by treaty belongs to First Nations, which some argue would make the occupation of most of B.C. illegal in our own laws — a position not shared by the Province of British Columbia, it should be noted.

BUFFY SAINTE-MARIE

The fight for Indigenous rights is as old as this country. Here, Buffy Sainte-Marie, at a rally of Aboriginal people in Edmonton on November 19, 1981 urged people to look at the elders because they have "been fighting for rights all their lives just to get you where you are today". (CP PHOTO/Dave Buston) (Canadian Press)

Sesquicen... what?

Sesquicentennial. Ses·qui·cen·ten·ni·al. It means a one-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary, and if you perfect the pronunciation it's a real crowd pleaser.

You're not the only one

The coming year isn't being touted as a big anniversary for just Canada: Montreal is marking 375 years since Fort Ville-Marie was founded in 1642, and in sports, the National Hockey League is celebrating its centennial year and the Ottawa Senators their 25th.

historic-montreal-featured

As a city, Montreal is older than Canada. Sherbrooke Street in winter, Montreal, QC, 1896. Detail from a photograph by William Notman & Son 1896.

A year by any other name

Call it Canada 150 or simply 2017, this year is an occasion to reflect back and look forward; 2017 marks 150 years since a turning point in history, but the future is ever open.
Could 2017 mark a watershed, too? In the age of Truth and Reconciliation, climate change and our American neighbour's political shakeup… what do we want to be when we grow up? What will the country at its tricentennial — if we're still giving a nod to Confederation in 2167 — look back at and remember of this year?
It's your birthday, Canada, make a wish. Make it count.



 
Everything is always in process 
Only compassion defeats dehumanization.

Friday, October 14, 2016

A Free Press: Should the Fourth Estate be an Independent Branch of Government?



If a free press engaged in journalistic investigation in pursuit of the public’s right to know is a vital part of modern democracy, then shouldn’t it be like the Judiciary, an independent branch of government with constitutionally guaranteed funding from the people rather than unpredictable corporate investors and advertising revenue?

The media items that I post are not endorsements of the source so much as the nuggets I’ve found inside the dung pile. A lot come from CBC, particularly the show Ideas because it tends to explore the topics (just about anything) with suspension of disbelief, an open mind, and a critical eye. CBC radio comes close to what I propose. It tries to bite every hand that feeds it.  It smells rot, or thinks it does. 

The Legislative branch shouldn’t be able to silence or leash it with cutbacks and a need for ads.  Independence is supposed to help protect the Judiciary from political influence, campaign debts, and personal bias. A judge is supposed to represent, interpret, and protect, the rule of law.  An official media could absorb the functions of ombudsmen and auditors, departmental and general.  The market can keep the salacious sensationalism for ratings and ad revenue.  It’s hard to speak truth to power when it owns you. 

Of course it can go wrong and be corrupted, just like everything else. That’s why we have checks and balances and rule of law. 

I think our democracies need another firm leg to stand on. They’re toppling under the weight of profit. Also, a squared building with three cornerstones is an unsound construction.

It may also be worth considering also including the scientific research departments in order to create an overall Investigative Branch acting as evidence-based judges of information, verified for use by citizens and the rest of government without partisanship.

I was also thinking about the problem of the power of lobbyists and the former politicians who often become them. Interest groups, social as well as industrial, need money to have a continual presence in order to have a voice heard through the noise. someone in the capital able to negotiate the system and get things done. We could establish a department or office of Lobbying with civil servants similar to public defenders or ombudsmen, separate from the Investigative Branch. Available to all, interests would get a public lobbyist instead of hiring a private one, a buffer between them and the politicians that ensures equality of influence, funding, and potential success. Any other form of lobbying or direct contact between politicians and interests would be prohibited, except through the same official channels available to all citizens. 

Just a thought.

 

Monday November 14, 2016

The uncertain future of journalism and why it matters


Listen to Full Episode 53:58

Whether it's radio, television, print or online, anyone who works in journalism can feel the ground shifting under their feet. The business model of news has been radically disrupted by the Internet age, and yet, the mandate of journalism remains the same: to uncover and report the truth and hold power to account. In this month's edition of The Enright Files, Michael Enright explores the mandate of journalism and how to maintain the integrity and craft even while it faces an uncertain future.

Guests in this episode: 
  • Walter Robinson, former head of the investigative unit at the Boston Globe, which became the subject of the Academy Award-winning film, Spotlight.
  • James Compton, associate professor in the Faculty of Information and Media Studies at Western University in London, Ontario.
     
  • David Carr, the late media columnist for The New York Times.





Everything is always in process
Only compassion defeats dehumanization.